Factory

Technology without the smoke.

I design maintainable solutions, integrate systems and reduce the risk of changing software already in production.

01 A Architect Architect Read more
Architect

The Architect sees the city while the developer works on one of its buildings. The Architect considers how applications, services, databases, integrations, security boundaries, and infrastructure must coexist over time.

Naturally, this usually means the Architect shows up to the office wearing a pristine, brand-new yellow hard hat, completely clean and dust-free, while looking at diagrams from afar, while the developer is in the trenches wearing a battered white hard hat that has survived three production outages and a database migration on a Friday afternoon.

The developer brings practical information from implementation and may discover that an architectural idea behaves differently in real conditions. Their communication must flow in both directions: architecture provides guidance, while development provides evidence. A strong architecture must support real work rather than exist only in diagrams.

02 BH Bug Hunter Bug Hunter Read more
Bug Hunter

My work begins by following the software story: tracing a user action through interfaces, business rules, and external systems to understand the complete journey. Across full-stack and legacy environments, I navigate complex architectures while wrestling with an alphabet soup of environment acronyms and internal naming conventions.

A normal day brings new requirements, unexpected errors, or broken processes. As one of the firefighters of the IT universe, before changing anything, I investigate the full context: talking with people, reproducing issues, and tracking problems across servers, permissions, and data. Whether a bug comes from faulty logic or bad data, I design, test, and deploy solutions knowing that “it works on my machine” is never enough.

I view databases as the organizational memory that holds vital transactions and operational outcomes, allowing me to track information seamlessly from the interface down to storage and ensure accuracy in sensitive sectors like healthcare and finance.

Ultimately, troubleshooting feels like software archaeology, and dealing with legacy systems is simply part of the job of preserving critical business knowledge through controlled evolution. Wearing the developer hard hat, I build to help the system grow. Through sustainable engineering and thoughtful incremental improvements, I reduce resource waste and extend system life, keeping software efficient and continuously improving one step at a time.

03 BA Business Analyst Business Analyst Read more
Business Analyst

The Business Analyst (BA) helps the developer understand the story behind a requirement. While a request may initially arrive as a simple sentence, a ticket, or a business rule, the BA investigates who needs it, why it matters, and how it fits into the organization’s processes.

Sometimes, this means the BA gets to tour customer facilities to see amazing products in action in the real world. Naturally, the developer does not need to travel for that; they just sit at their desk and meticulously model it all into a database schema. After all, why experience the product firsthand when you can spend your afternoon debating whether a property should be a string or an integer?

Meanwhile, the developer contributes the technical perspective, identifying missing scenarios, dependencies, limitations, and possible alternatives. Their relationship works best when both challenge assumptions before development begins, preventing misunderstandings from becoming expensive software changes.

04 DE Data Engineer Data Engineer Read more
Data Engineer

The Data Engineer / DBA protects the databases that preserve the organization’s operational memory and ensures that information moves reliably between systems, platforms, and analytical environments. The developer works with that information through queries, transactions, procedures, and application logic, making clear agreements about formats, validation, ownership, frequency, and expected behavior essential.

Of course, this usually means the Data Engineer (DBA) looks remarkably like someone who permanently lives in a dimly lit basement surrounded by a chaotic ecosystem of nested triggers, complex views, ancient packages, and 500-line stored procedures that nobody dares to touch. Whenever a developer casually asks to “just add a quick column,” they emerge from their underground lair wearing sunglasses to shield their eyes from normal sunlight, ready to explain why that minor modification will cause three overnight ETL pipelines to implode and bring the entire database cluster to its knees.

Their collaboration protects data from becoming inconsistent, duplicated, delayed, or misunderstood. The developer and the Data Engineer (DBA) should discuss changes before they become emergencies, optimizing queries, planning migrations, and protecting access. A feature is not complete merely because information was sent; both sides must know that it arrived correctly, retained its meaning, and can be traced when something goes wrong without affecting the entire system.

05 DE DevOps Engineer DevOps Engineer Read more
DevOps Engineer

The developer creates the software, while the DevOps Engineer helps it travel safely from a local environment into testing and production. They collaborate on builds, deployments, infrastructure, configuration, monitoring, automation, and recovery procedures.

Naturally, this partnership always starts with the developer’s absolute favorite magic words: “Well, it worked perfectly on my machine, so it must be a DevOps problem.” In response, the DevOps Engineer acts as the ultimate gatekeeper, ensuring that nobody can ever sneak a rogue build straight into production without triggering a dozen automated alerts and being noticed instantly.

This relationship removes the wall between “the code works” and “the system works.” Both must understand that deployment is part of development, not an event that happens afterward. Their shared objective is to make releases predictable, observable, repeatable, and less dependent on manual intervention, preferably without anyone having to page them at 3:00 AM on a Sunday.

06 L Leadership Leadership Read more
Leadership

An exceptional IT leader connects people, technology, and business outcomes by translating broad goals into clear technical priorities that keep the team focused on high-value work. Rather than doing everyone’s job, I expect this person to enable success by providing necessary resources, granting decision-making space, and actively removing obstacles. When faced with tough choices regarding architecture, security, budgets, and risk, I expect them to consult specialists, weigh the consequences, and take full responsibility for timely decisions without getting paralyzed by uncertainty.

Throughout the delivery process, I want them to balance speed with reliability, protecting maintainability, testing, and security while avoiding harmful shortcuts. Serving as a crucial bridge, they should translate complex technical risks into plain language for nontechnical stakeholders and clarify business requirements for developers. Above all, I look for someone who builds unshakeable trust and fosters a deep psychological safety net where mistakes are embraced openly without fear, serving as the essential foundation from which true perfection and mastery emerge. In this secure space, teams can surface problems early, learn fearlessly, and own their commitments.

This leader must also focus on growth by mentoring others and delegating responsibility to build an independent, capable team rather than fostering dependency. When it comes to emerging technologies like AI and cloud services, I expect them to drive practical innovation, adopting new tools only when they solve genuine business problems. Furthermore, they need to embed security and efficiency directly into daily practices and system architecture for long-term sustainability. Ultimately, by defending realistic timelines, shielding the team from distractions, and taking ultimate responsibility, I expect them to bring clarity to uncertainty, cement trust under pressure, and deliver technology that moves the organization forward.

Shared play

Team Building

Catching Devs

Catching Devs

A detective game where you unmask your team members' wildest pasts and cheat your way to victory!

Xplorify

Xplorify

Match the tracks, expose your team members, and bluff your way to victory in a music guessing game!

07 O Onboarding Onboarding Read more
Onboarding

Joining a software project with extensive experience across finance, healthcare, commerce, world trade, fraud, payments, and public and private sectors means stepping into a continuous story, whether it starts with a clean, modern repository or a legacy system bearing forgotten comments. My role extends far beyond writing code; it involves deeply understanding how a business operates, how its people and systems communicate, and how to bridge those gaps with reliable, secure, and maintainable software.

The journey begins much like entering a brand-new city, where orientation is essential before any meaningful contribution can be made. This phase starts with receiving and configuring the necessary equipment, from workstations and security tokens to essential communication hardware. Once the physical setup is complete, I configure the environment, connect securely to the company or customer network, apply organizational policies, and verify access across development, testing, documentation, and deployment platforms.

Simultaneously, I establish my digital identity within the organization. Setting up profiles across employee portals, messaging hubs, code repositories, and ticketing systems acts as the first digital handshake, especially in remote, traveling, or international teams. By completing these profiles without falling back to a boring set of symbols or a generic landscape photo, adding location details, and outlining a clear overview of my expertise, I help reveal and share personality across the company while laying the groundwork for effective communication, collaboration, and seamless integration. Along the way, I recognize that technical knowledge sometimes moves faster through genuine human connection, enabling teams to build trust and solve problems together.

Shared play

Team Building

Catching Devs

Catching Devs

A detective game where you unmask your team members' wildest pasts and cheat your way to victory!

Xplorify

Xplorify

Match the tracks, expose your team members, and bluff your way to victory in a music guessing game!

08 PO Product Owner Product Owner Read more
Product Owner

The relationship between a developer and a customer or Product Owner often mirrors the dynamic of someone rubbing a lamp and a genie ready to grant wishes. Customers arrive with seemingly simple requests, such as a new button, a minor field, or a quick notification, believing it will only take a few lines of code. But the developer looks past the surface, seeing the vast web of database impacts, security controls, integrations, and future maintenance hidden behind the request.

Instead of blindly acting as a wish-granter, a responsible developer investigates the true problem behind the idea. Working alongside the Product Owner, who prioritizes business needs, the developer uncovers the technical consequences lurking in the shadows of small requests. They realize that unchecked “small” wishes eventually pile up, turning a clean system into an overly complicated mess.

Rather than becoming an unhelpful gatekeeper who says no to everything or a yes-man who breeds future disaster, the developer offers honest transparency. By laying out the options, trade-offs, and long-term costs, they ensure the customer understands the implications of their choices. Ultimately, the customer brings the vision, the Product Owner brings the market priority, and the developer brings systemic reality, turning magic into a shared, responsible decision.

09 PM Project Manager Project Manager Read more
Project Manager

The Project Manager coordinates the wider journey: managing priorities, resources, dependencies, risks, communication, and timelines. The developer provides an honest view of technical progress, uncertainty, complexity, and the consequences of changing direction.

Of course, this usually means the Project Manager’s favorite morning ritual is taking a deeply complex, multi-layered architectural challenge and asking if it can somehow be delivered by next Tuesday because a stakeholder got excited in a meeting. In response, the developer has to channel their inner philosopher to explain that software estimation is not a menu where you can negotiate the laws of physics away for a faster release.

Dates should be informed by reality rather than pressure. The Project Manager should help remove organizational obstacles and create clarity, while the developer must communicate problems early rather than waiting until a deadline has already failed. Trust depends on both sides presenting the truth, even when it is inconvenient, and ideally, keeping Gantt charts and Jira dashboards grounded in actual reality.

10 QA QA QA Read more
QA

Development and QA are not opposing forces on a battlefield; they are two musicians tuning the same guitar.

The developer builds the instrument, wiring its parts, adjusting the strings, and ensuring the code compiles and delivers the main workflow. But QA listens with a different ear. They pluck every string, test unusual rhythms, and find the subtle flaws that escape the person who built the instrument, discovering whether the music holds up on a loud stage or falls apart under pressure.

When QA reports a flaw, it is not a critique, but an invitation to listen closer. Yet, for the music to play smoothly, communication must be precise. A vague complaint of “it does not sound right” helps no one; QA must share the exact notes, conditions, and expectations, while the developer must listen without defensiveness.

Sometimes, they find they were playing from entirely different versions of the song due to unclear requirements. Instead of trying to prove who is right or wrong, developer and tester collaborate: trading notes, adjusting chords, and refining the system together until the software plays harmoniously for the user.

11 SM Scrum Master Scrum Master Read more
Scrum Master

Rather than acting as a deadline chaser, a strong Scrum Master functions as a quiet force behind progress, like someone who keeps the road open for a developer focused on building the product. Instead of repeatedly asking for arrival dates or pushing for premature estimates, which only creates pressure and interruptions, the Scrum Master focuses on removing friction. They clear away bureaucratic hurdles, track down approvals, organize scattered priorities, and absorb external confusion so the development team can concentrate entirely on solving problems and writing code.

Beyond managing logistics, an effective Scrum Master listens to the subtle, unspoken signals of a project: noticing hesitation, hidden bottlenecks, and growing technical debt that raw metrics and task boards miss. Ultimately, their success is measured not by how often they demand status updates, but by how many obstacles disappear, how clear priorities become, and how consistently the project moves forward under its own momentum.

12 SS Security Specialist Security Specialist Read more
Security Specialist

The Security Specialist helps the developer see the doors, windows, and hidden entrances that may exist in a system. Authentication, permissions, encryption, APIs, credentials, sensitive data, and external dependencies must be considered throughout development rather than inspected only before release.

Naturally, this relationship always starts with the Security Specialist having a mini-heart attack upon discovering that someone hardcoded a plain text password in a public config file, labeled it admin123, and gave every single service full root/write access across the board. In response, the security team swoops in to remind everyone that “read-only rights” actually mean read-only, and that printing raw API tokens and customer credit cards directly to standard error logs in clear text is generally frowned upon.

Security should not be a battle between someone who wants to deliver and someone who always says no. The specialist explains risks and possible protections, while the developer helps find solutions that remain usable and maintainable. Together, they make security part of the product instead of an obstacle added at the end.

13 S Stakeholders Stakeholders Read more
Stakeholders

Stakeholders represent the people who invest in, depend on, influence, or are affected by the product. They provide business direction, priorities, expectations, and the definition of value.

Naturally, this relationship usually begins when a stakeholder casually drops a completely minor request, like “Can we just add an AI-powered, blockchain-secured dashboard by the end of the week?”, while completely unaware that the underlying legacy system is currently holding together with duct tape and sheer optimism. In response, the developer has to translate complex technical bottlenecks into human terms without sounding like they are speaking an alien language.

The developer helps stakeholders understand what each decision may involve. A request that sounds small can affect security, data, integrations, maintenance, or future development. The developer should explain those consequences honestly, ensuring that business leaders realize software development is not a magic vending machine where you press a button and code instantly appears.

Their relationship is successful when technical effort is connected to meaningful outcomes. The goal is not to build every requested feature just because it sounded cool in a pitch meeting, but to create the right product, solve the right problems, and use the organization’s time and resources responsibly.

14 ST Support Team Support Team Read more
Support Team

The Support team hears the user before the developer does. It receives the questions, frustrations, unusual scenarios, and real-world problems that do not always appear during design or testing.

Naturally, this creates a sacred unspoken rule among developers: the absolute gold standard of clean code is a Slack notification from Support saying they have not seen a single ticket with your name attached to it all week. After all, nothing validates your architecture quite like nobody needing to ping you to ask why a feature is currently eating user data in production.

Support provides valuable context, while the developer investigates the underlying technical cause and explains the solution clearly. The relationship should not be limited to passing tickets between queues. When both teams share knowledge, recurring incidents can become permanent product improvements, meaning fewer emergency firefighting sessions for everyone involved.

15 TL Tech Lead Tech Lead Read more
Tech Lead

The Tech Lead helps the developer make decisions that remain consistent with the direction of the team. Rather than dictating every single line of code, the Tech Lead provides guidance, reviews important choices, shares experience, and helps identify risks before they spread through the system.

Of course, the ultimate test of a great Tech Lead is whether they can explain a complex system architecture using only a whiteboard marker and an alarming amount of coffee, while making it look deceptively simple.

A good Tech Lead creates independence instead of dependency. Developers should feel comfortable discussing doubts, proposing alternatives, and disagreeing respectfully. The purpose is not to prove who knows more, but to raise the technical quality of the entire team.

16 UX UX/UI Designer UX/UI Designer Read more
UX/UI Designer

The UX/UI Designer imagines how users will experience the product, while the developer transforms that vision into a functioning interface. One focuses on clarity, accessibility, consistency, and interaction; the other considers how those ideas can be implemented across devices, browsers, platforms, and existing systems. Even when modern frameworks make “full-stack” effortless, a truly exceptional design can still push any application to the next level.

Of course, designers famously cross over to the dark side the moment they stop showing nice, harmless aesthetic drawings in Figma and actually start committing code changes directly to the repository. Nothing strikes fear into a team’s heart quite like a designer pushing a CSS fix that accidentally rewrites the entire state management architecture.

Neither should work in isolation. The developer should not reduce every design to what is easiest to code, and the designer should not ignore technical limitations. Through continuous communication, they create an experience that is attractive, practical, responsive, and genuinely useful.

  1. Globant Globant University 47 trainings

    Globant

    Trainings

  2. Atos Atos University 30 trainings

    Atos

    Trainings

Hi

Got an interesting problem?

Let’s pull that vision straight from your mind and build it into a digital experience.

Let’s talk about work